<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteAnother Columbia River Oil Trains Proposal - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/07/another-columbia-river-oil-trains-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/07/another-columbia-river-oil-trains-proposal/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Another Columbia River Oil Trains Proposal</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/07/another-columbia-river-oil-trains-proposal/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[And a chance for the public to stop it. | Northwest communities have been knocking down oil train development proposals as fast as they can spring up. In the last two years alone the region’s opposition movement has, by various means, spiked projects all around western Washington: once in Vancouver, once in Anacortes, and three times in Hoquiam. One big proposal is still under review in Vancouver, but the odds of its approval are shrinking. Stymied at every turn, there’s...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
