<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteDisplacement Dilemma - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/08/displacement-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/08/displacement-dilemma/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Displacement Dilemma</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/06/08/displacement-dilemma/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What Seattle's draft study tells us&mdash;and doesn't&mdash;about displacement. | Cascadia’s largest city, Seattle, just released its draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) program, a core part of the city’s Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda. (I’ve written about MHA here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.) The question that looms largest for many is whether upzones proposed to allow larger buildings should be scaled back in areas with high risk of displacement, as suggested...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
