<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteHow Seattle’s Design Review Sabotages Housing Affordability - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/09/06/how-seattles-design-review-sabotages-housing-affordability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/09/06/how-seattles-design-review-sabotages-housing-affordability/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>How Seattle’s Design Review Sabotages Housing Affordability</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/09/06/how-seattles-design-review-sabotages-housing-affordability/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 20:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[And what’s needed to fix it.  | Since 1994, Cascadia’s largest city, Seattle, has subjected most of its new apartment construction to “design review,” in which building proposals must win approval from a volunteer citizen board. But if there’s no accounting for taste, is it realistic to think a city can enforce good design through a process reliant on a consensus of subjective opinions? How new buildings look is one thing, but what are possible unseen drawbacks...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
