<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Thin Green Line Goes to the Polls - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/11/13/the-thin-green-line-goes-to-the-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/11/13/the-thin-green-line-goes-to-the-polls/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Thin Green Line Goes to the Polls</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/11/13/the-thin-green-line-goes-to-the-polls/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[How Washington communities voted on fossil fuels in 2017.  | The Northwest has seen an onslaught of large-scale fossil fuel development schemes. From coal export terminals to refinery expansions to petrochemical projects, the industry aims to turn the region into a major center for dirty energy. But communities are fighting back. Amidst tremendous controversy, local elections around the Northwest are, increasingly often, becoming referendums on these fossil fuel projects. That was certainly the case in 2017, the year when big...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
