<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteGood Transit Is Pointless When People Can&#039;t Live Near It - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2021/04/07/good-transit-is-pointless-when-people-cant-live-near-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2021/04/07/good-transit-is-pointless-when-people-cant-live-near-it/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Good Transit Is Pointless When People Can&#8217;t Live Near It</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2021/04/07/good-transit-is-pointless-when-people-cant-live-near-it/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A good Oregon bill would hold high-capacity transit lines to a very basic standard. | If the government pays hundreds of millions of dollars to help build and operate a high-quality transit line, people should generally be allowed to live near it if they want to. You&#8217;d think this would be uncontroversial. Especially among people who run public transit agencies. Unfortunately, some transit leaders here in Oregon seem to be distracted by the exciting goal of building high-capacity bus and rail lines, or at least...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
