<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Sightline Institute</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.sightline.org</provider_url><author_name>Anna Fahey</author_name><author_url>https://www.sightline.org/profile/anna-fahey/</author_url><title>To Drill or Not to Drill is Not the *Only* Question, II - Sightline Institute</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="OkJyiM9ZsV"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/06/20/to-drill-or-not-to-drill-is-not-the-only-question-ii/"&gt;To Drill or Not to Drill is Not the *Only* Question, II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.sightline.org/2011/06/20/to-drill-or-not-to-drill-is-not-the-only-question-ii/embed/#?secret=OkJyiM9ZsV" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;To Drill or Not to Drill is Not the *Only* Question, II&#x201D; &#x2014; Sightline Institute" data-secret="OkJyiM9ZsV" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.sightline.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/oil-drill-rusty-MorgueFile-by-Clarita-e1549739060749.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>900</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1225</thumbnail_height><description>A while back I wrote about how public opinion data are informed in great part by how survey questions are framed. Nothing shocking there. I used the American public's increasing support for offshore drilling as an example. It turned out that when poll questions offered a choice between drilling and more investment in alternative energy, alternative energy came out ahead---by a mile.  But lots of polls don&#x2019;t give respondents a full range of options, or alternatively, only some of the research findings are reported, so it winds up looking like drilling is all they want (because that's all anyone asked them about or that's the "juicy" headline). The pitfall is that the rosy numbers for drilling can be cherry-picked by the "Drill, Baby, Drill" folks lurking at the gates of ANWR.&lt;!--</description></oembed>
