<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Sightline Institute</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.sightline.org</provider_url><author_name>Clark Williams-Derry</author_name><author_url>https://www.sightline.org/profile/clark-williams-derry/</author_url><title>New Report: Rural Sprawl in Metropolitan Portland - Sightline Institute</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Tv1uQcDzqa"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/07/18/new-report-rural-sprawl-in-metropolitan-portland/"&gt;New Report: Rural Sprawl in Metropolitan Portland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.sightline.org/2012/07/18/new-report-rural-sprawl-in-metropolitan-portland/embed/#?secret=Tv1uQcDzqa" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;New Report: Rural Sprawl in Metropolitan Portland&#x201D; &#x2014; Sightline Institute" data-secret="Tv1uQcDzqa" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.sightline.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/population_growth_2000_2010_edited-small1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>693</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>882</thumbnail_height><description>The Portland metro area is an interesting test case for smart growth. The Oregon side of the region operates under the nation's most mature growth management system. The Washington side operates under a newer set of rules, enacted in the mid-1990s. On paper, the two growth management programs share many features. But as a new Sightline report shows, their records have diverged: Clark County, home to the city of Vancouver, Washington, has allowed substantially more housing and population growth on rural lands than the Oregon side of the Portland metro area.</description></oembed>
