<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Sightline Institute</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.sightline.org</provider_url><author_name>Clark Williams-Derry</author_name><author_url>https://www.sightline.org/profile/clark-williams-derry/</author_url><title>Would the Dakota Access Pipeline Help Canadian Oil Producers? - Sightline Institute</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ibeH3D1RY0"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/01/27/would-the-dakota-access-pipeline-help-canadian-oil-producers/"&gt;Would the Dakota Access Pipeline Help Canadian Oil Producers?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.sightline.org/2017/01/27/would-the-dakota-access-pipeline-help-canadian-oil-producers/embed/#?secret=ibeH3D1RY0" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Would the Dakota Access Pipeline Help Canadian Oil Producers?&#x201D; &#x2014; Sightline Institute" data-secret="ibeH3D1RY0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.sightline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/The-Dakota-Access-Pipeline-under-construction-by-Lars-Plougmann-cc.-e1485479033492.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1000</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>361</thumbnail_height><description>As you may have heard, the Trump administration recently&#xA0;signed orders&#xA0;designed to pave the way for two controversial oil pipelines, Dakota Access (DAPL) and Keystone XL. Surprisingly, though, the main beneficiaries of this move may be Canadian, not American. This seems clear enough the case for the Keystone XL pipeline, which was explicitly designed to move [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
