Donate Newsletters

Ahren Stroming

SwatchJunkies

SwatchJunkies

Lower Columbia River Critical Front on the Thin Green Line

In all the Pacific Northwest, the Lower Columbia River is the most vulnerable to the threat of fossil fuel expansion. ...
Read More

Small Seattle Pipeline Expansion would mean Big Carbon Pollution Increase

The slow-motion battle expanding a six-mile pipeline in suburban Seattle might seem like small potatoes, but it’s Exhibit A in ...
Read More

King County Poised to Lock Out Fossil Fuels

Update: The King County Council voted 6-2 to support the moratorium. King County is poised to join the ranks of ...
Read More

Kalama Methanol Facility Could Put Taxpayers on the Hook

For the past several years, the Northwest has been ground zero in a debate over whether to build a trio ...
Read More

Is Coal Still Needed in the Pacific Northwest?

The Northwest is not exactly the heart of coal country. Over almost a decade of bruising disputes about whether to ...
Read More

Will Washington’s Oil Industry Ever Stop Expanding?

The Northwest is poised between promise and peril. The coming years could usher in a golden era of low-cost and ...
Read More

Small Town Silicon Smelter Plan Tees Up Big Questions

Northwest communities have been fighting an onslaught of dirty energy proposals for nearly a decade, from coal terminals and oil ...
Read More

The Oil Spill That Could Happen Here, Part 2

Since Washington state lawmakers convened in Olympia this January and took up legislation on oil transport, the nation has seen at least one major pipeline spill when an Exxon pipe leaked 40,000 gallons of crude into the Yellowstone River. It was the second time in just a few years that the pipeline had ruptured: it spilled 63,000 gallons into the river in 2011, for which regulators fined the oil giant $1 million. The latest incident was a timely reminder of just how often---and just how serious---oil pipeline spills are. In fact, in the last five years, there have been two other serious oil pipeline spills that did meaningful damage to the environment and local communities. Those stories are warnings for communities near existing pipelines, many of which are slated for expansion.
Read More

The Oil Spill That Could Happen Here, Part 1

Spills are an unfortunate reality of moving oil on or near water. Try as we might to avoid them, the ...
Read More

Grays Harbor Ship Traffic: The Impact of Oil Plans

Of all the places in the Northwest that would be affected by a ramp-up in oil transport, none stands to be as profoundly transformed as Grays Harbor. A trio of proposed crude-by-rail-to-vessel schemes at the Port would result in staggering increases in oil-bearing vessels moving in and out of the bay. Based on figures in the the Washington Department of Ecology’s “Vessel Transit and Entry Counts” database, it is possible to contrast the average volume of ship and barge traffic over the last decade to the number of vessel trips that would be induced by planned oil sites on Grays Harbor. The most direct comparison---the number of current to potential future tank vessel---reveals that the three sites could multiply laden oil tankers and barges by 44 times.
Read More

Columbia River Ship Traffic: the Impact of Coal and Oil Plans

Like the Salish Sea, the Columbia River is threatened by the risks of oil spills. If you need proof of the risk, look no further than the historical record of major spills or the dozens of recent close calls on the river. In fact, the Coast Guard sector responsible for the region that includes Grays Harbor plus the Columbia and Snake Rivers responds to 275 oil pollution incidents in a typical year Yet the risk of spills could soon increase dramatically. If they are built, new fossil fuel shipment proposals would result in huge increases to both oil and other petroleum ship movements, as well as to overall large vessel traffic on the Columbia River. Using the Washington Department of Ecology’s “Vessel Transit and Entry Counts” database, we calculate the average volume of ship and barge traffic over the last decade and compared that to the number of vessel trips that would be induced by newly-built and planned fossil fuel sites in the region.
Read More

Salish Sea Ship Traffic: the Impact of Coal and Oil Plans

The Northwest's most important waters are under a near-constant threat of oil spills. It’s a fact made plain by the historical record of major spills and the dozens of recent close calls, as well as the best available data and modeling analysis of oil spills risks. Yet the risk of spills could soon increase, perhaps dramatically. A spate of new fossil fuel shipment proposals could well generate very large increases in both oil transport and overall vessel traffic in places like the Salish Sea. To provide a clearer picture of what's ahead, we crunched the numbers. Using the Washington Department of Ecology's "Vessel Transit and Entry Counts" database, we calculate the average volume of ship and barge traffic over the last decade in contrast that to the number of vessel trips that would be induced by newly-built and planned fossil fuel sites in the region.
Read More

12
×
Privacy Overview
Sightline Institute

More information about our privacy notice

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Additional Cookies

This website uses social media to collect anonymous information such as which platform are our users coming from.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us better reach our audiences.