• Density We Can Afford

    Apropos of Clark’s density posts. I thought I’d try a new tack. It’s a risky one, because I’m disagreeing with my boss. Sort of. First, I agree with Clark, that supply-side housing policy (increasing density) keeps city housing more affordable than it otherwise would be. But I also believe (with Sheldon Cooper) that market-based mechanisms cannot meet the housing needs of lower- and middle-income people because the market is structurally...
    Read more »
  • Housing Affordability Rashomon

    In two recentposts, I argued that urban high-rise apartments—as are being proposed for downtown Seattle—can be good for housing affordability.   But in a thoughtful comment on one of my posts, Sheldon Cooper from Homestead Community Land Trust argues out that high-density urban redevelopment can crowd out affordable housing, not increase its supply.  Now, who’s right?  I actually think we both are, since we were talking about slightly different things—both of...
    Read more »
  • Appreciating Portland

    I’m always late with this sort of thing, but last Friday’s New York Times had some interesting data on rising housing prices in US Metropolitan areas.  Three things stand out to me as worth noting.  First, even though runaway home prices are a hot topic at party conversations, the gains in greater Portland and greater Seattle aren’t too far from the national average.  Across the US, housing prices have grown...
    Read more »
  • I Must Be Dense

    Seems like there’s been a rash of anti-density columns in Seattle of late. First there was last week’s Mossback column in the Seattle Weekly (which I discussed here). Then, on Saturday,  P-I columnist Joel Connelly got into the action with this chestnut in a piece about Seattle’s struggling middle class: Are working families going to move into the higher buildings and downtown condos championed by Mayor Nickels? Not likely. The...
    Read more »
  • Moss Backwards

    I’m trying my best to give a charitable reading of Knute Berger’s Mossback column in the Seattle Weekly railing against urban density. But it’s hard. To summarize as best I can:  Berger doesn’t like Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels’ plan to promote high-rise housing near Seattle’s downtown because, well…I guess Knute liked the Seattle skyline just as it was in 1980, thank you very much. Now, Berger makes at least one...
    Read more »
  • Vancouver, BC's Freeway Dreams

    Editor’s note: The following essay is by blog contributor (and former Vancouver city councillor) Gordon Price, a reprint from his "Price Tags" newsletter and Business in Vancouver. (See the Price Tags version for accompanying images.) Why is the Provincial Government going to spend $3 to $5 billion on a strategy which it acknowledges will not work? If, as everyone seems to say, we can’t build our way out of traffic...
    Read more »
  • Visualize This!

    From our good friends and map gurus at CommEn Space:  a nifty visualization of how Pierce County has changed over the last century or so.  Nifty eye candy, showing the effects of sprawl, logging, and forest regrowth on the landscape.
    Read more »
  • Burnt CAFE

    It’s a rare treat to read a dry, technical report and—almost by accident—learn something surprising, counterintuitive, useful and (at least to me) genuinely new.  Which is exactly what happened when I read this paper (beware, pdf) by Todd Litman at the Victoria Transportation Policy Institute.  The upshot:  raising vehicle fuel-economy standards, which always seemed to me like a good idea, may actually be counterproductive, even if they’re truly successful at...
    Read more »
  • Tolls for Thee

    Via Planetizen News, evidence that the impossible is finally catching on:  according to Governing magazine, more and more jurisdictions in the US and Europe are making drivers pay to use roads when they’re congested.  And remarkably, the politicians responsible for instituting the tolls don’t seem to be paying much of a political price. London’s experiment is perhaps the most famous:  the city now charges drivers about $10 to drive into...
    Read more »
  • Traffic Jam

    I’ve been putting off commenting on Washington State’s recently-passed $8 billion transportationpackage—funded by a 9.5 cent per gallon increase and new weight-based vehicle fees—until I could figure out exactly how I feel about it. I still can’t. It’s complicated. In general, I like taxes on gasoline.  Gasoline carries many costs—security, air and water pollution, climate-warming emissions, and the like—that aren’t captured by the market price.  Which means that, no matter...
    Read more »