Donate Newsletters

Legalizing It (Your Rain Barrel)

Just a few years ago, a Washington state homeowner who simply stuck a rain barrel at the end of a gutter to collect water for watering a garden or washing a car was arguably breaking the law.

Sure, people did it anyway. But if one really wanted to get persnickety, there was an argument to be made that anyone collecting rain needed a water right, since the state at one point in its history laid claim to regulating all waters “above, upon and below” the Earth.

Steps Toward Stormwater Solutions

For years Washington’s leaders have fingered stormwater runoff as Puget Sound enemy No. 1. Now the state has real data to back the charges, and decision makers will be able to use this information to better inform regulatory and policy decisions. Right now the state Department of Ecology is working on a draft plan for new stormwater rules, and the Puget Sound Partnership, the agency spearheading the restoration of Washington’s inland sea, last week approved its ecosystem goals for 2020.

Ecology published its best pollution data to date for Puget Sound in a study called the “Toxics in Surface Runoff to Puget Sound: Phase 3 Data and Load Estimates,” in which scientists sampled streams at 16 spots in the Puyallup and Snohomish river watersheds. The goal of the research was to try to get a better idea of how much pollution is flushed from the region’s  neighborhoods, business and industrial areas, farms, and forests.

I recently wrote an article about the research that ran in Crosscut, an online news site. The over-simplified takeaway message: the most toxic runoff is coming from industrial and commercial sites, so that would be a smart target for projects that clean up and control stormwater. The study also showed that the least polluted runoff came from forests, highlighting the importance of preventing sprawl in undeveloped areas.

Read more

Grow Rain Gardens in Your Community

Homeowners, business owners, nonprofit groups, and government officials are invited to attend the 2011 Seattle Watersheds Forum – Partnerships in Action tonight at REI. The event is free, and I’ll be moderating the discussion panels.

The city of Seattle event will show interested folks how to make green stormwater projects happen in their own backyards and businesses. The first panel will focus on how to create successful partnerships and share resources to create projects that will improve water quality and protect Puget Sound. The second panel will hear from folks who have hands-on experience using rain gardens and cisterns on their own property.

Stormwater Legislative Wrap Up

Trashed drain_Flickr_Chloe DietzNew rules approved by Washington’s lawmakers will cut the amount of salmon-harming copper,   toxic coal pollutants, and algae-stoking fertilizers that foul local waterways. Oregon legislators are halfway to approving a ban on copper brake pads—a ban that Washington approved last year.

It’s exciting news for Puget Sound, the Columbia and Willamette rivers, and countless other waterways threatened by the region’s fire hose of stormwater filth. But in truth, the stormwater cup is only half full as the Washington legislative session nears its close for the year. City and county organizations, green groups, and labor interests have again lost their fight to create a fee to pay for projects to reduce the stormwater runoff that imperils human health; salmon, orcas, and insects; and our buildings and roadways.

But let’s review the stormwater wins in more detail first.

Read more

Rain Garden Goof in Ballard

For more than a decade, all of the eco-friendly stormwater projects that Seattle touched turned to green. The city rebuilt block after neighborhood block to incorporate rain gardens and other natural strategies that can clean up and reduce polluted runoff. The projects worked great: they showcased native plants and sucked up the extra rainwater like … Read more

It’s Raining Rain Gardens

HP rain garden_StifflerResearchers have pointed the finger at stormwater runoff as the top source of pollution that’s getting into Puget Sound and other Northwest waterways. And because runoff comes from just about everywhere—roofs, roadways, parking lots, farms, and lawns—the solution has to be just as widespread.

Enter 12,000 Rain Gardens.

This week Washington State University and Stewardship Partners, a nonprofit working on land preservation, announced a campaign to promote the installing of 12,000 rain gardens around Puget Sound by 2016. The website even has a counter tracking the number of gardens and encourages folks to enter their rain garden into the database.

Here’s how a rain garden works. The garden is essentially a sloped ditch or pond that’s typically about 6 to 12 inches deep. The bottom of the depression is 1 to 2 feet of a soil mix that’s more absorbent than regular dirt. The garden is planted with shrubs and grass that can tolerate soggy soil.

Rain runoff is channeled into the garden, perhaps with a pipe that connects to a roof downspout or through a gap in a street curb that funnels road water into the depression. There’s also a route out of the garden should it overflow, which can be a drain linking to the stormwater system or into another area of the yard or road.

It’s a nice idea, but is 12,000 Rain Gardens just a feel-good gimmick that won’t amount to much?

I don’t think so, and in two words here’s why: Curtis Hinman.

Read more

All You Need to Know About Stormwater Runoff

Editor’s note: This blog is also available as a printer friendly pdf, and a similar version was published this week in Trim Tab, the publication of the Cascadia Green Building Council. 

A woman drowns when the basement of her Seattle home suddenly fills with a torrent of filthy water.

An overflow of 15 million gallons of sewage and stormwater fouls the shoreline of picturesque Port Angeles, putting the waterfront off limits to the residents and visitors of the Olympic Peninsula town due to health concerns.

Portlanders are socked with some of the nation’s highest water utility rates in order to pay for the city’s $1.4 billion “Big Pipe” projects.

Northwest scientists document coho salmon dying in urban streams with their bellies full of eggs, perishing before they can spawn.

Storm pipe_Flickr_Mike AncientThe culprit in each of these stories is the most mundane of villains: the rain. As rainwater streams off roofs and over roadways and landscaped yards, it mixes a massive toxic cocktail. It scoops up oil, grease, antifreeze, and heavy metals from cars; pesticides that poison aquatic insects and fish; fertilizers that stoke algal blooms; and bacteria from pet and farm-animal waste. A heavy rainfall delivers this potent shot of pollutants straight into streams, lakes, and bays—threatening everything from tiny herring to the region’s beloved orcas to our families’ health.

Stormwater doesn’t match the traditional image of pollution. There are no factory smokestacks belching waste, no pipes with a steady trickle of noxious industrial effluent. Despite appearances, stormwater packs a wallop. Polluted runoff long ago surpassed industry as the number one source for petroleum and other toxic chemicals that wash into the Northwest’s water bodies.

Each year, the Puget Sound is sullied by 14 million pounds of toxic chemicals and oil and grease—and that’s a conservative estimate.The amount of petroleum waste is so vast, it’s as if more than 70,000 cars pulled up to the beach and emptied their tanks straight into the Sound each year.*

Read more

No Mudslinging At Stormwater Forum

Business interests, greens, government reps, and Washington residents didn’t exactly all sing Kumbaya together at this week’s stormwater forum in Olympia, but the diverse crowd did find some common ground.

Beach_Lisa StifflerAs John Dodge of the Olympian described it in a great article Thursday, “…everyone attending the forum—including environmentalists and those with business ties—agreed that stormwater runoff is the biggest threat to Puget Sound’s health and will require a lot more money and coordinated effort to curb the problem.”

Sightline Institute was one of the event’s sponsors, along with Investigate West, a nonprofit news organization, and Washington Policy Center, a conservative-leaning think tank that offers a yin to our yang. The forum featured three panelists: Bill Ruckelshaus, former two-time administrator of the EPA and founding chair of the Puget Sound Partnership Leadership Council; Josh Baldi, special assistant to the director of the Washington Department of Ecology; and Grant Nelson, government affairs director for the Association of Washington Business.

Attendance was great at the event, which was held on Wednesday at the Capitol Campus; at least 70 people were in the crowd, including at last a half-dozen state lawmakers. We’d planned to record the event and TVW even showed up to broadcast it, but the Association of Washington Business hadn’t agreed to that in advance, so I took notes from the stormwater forum if you want to get a feel for the event (please note that this is not a verbatim transcript, so don’t quote from it).

The panelists had some great insights into the challenges and solutions posed by the tidal waves of polluted runoff that are damaging the Northwest’s environment, flooding homes, and threatening our health.

Here were some of their key points:

Read more

Stormwater Stomachache

Pepto_Miche11e_FlickrStormwater obviously causes problems for the environment and infrastructure, washing away salmon eggs in torrents of runoff and flooding basements. But does it threaten human health as well? You bet it does, and in ways that might surprise you.

Polluted runoff flushes raw sewage across beaches, triggers blooms of toxic algae in our drinking water systems, and contaminates shellfish and seafood we eat with bacteria and dangerous chemicals.

Over the past three years, sewage-tainted runoff has forced the closure of 32 Washington beaches, some for a couple of days, others for weeks. The problem is caused when rainwater mixes with the sewer system—sometimes by design and sometimes thanks to old sewer pipes that let the rain seep in. The cocktail of polluted runoff and raw sewage overwhelms the sewage treatment plant, forcing the combined sewer overflow (or CSO) to dump the waste into a nearby river, lake, or bay.

And what’s in that lovely concoction? Researchers find everything from salmonella bacteria to the parasite giardia, to Norwalk-like viruses. Ailments resulting from exposure to sewage-tinged water include:

diarrhea, vomiting, stomach cramps, fever, hepatitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, and swimmers itch.

People get sick by swallowing the water either when recreating in or when their drinking water becomes contaminated. You can get sick simply by inhaling small droplets, or through contact with skin, eyes, ears, and cuts. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and any immuno-compromised people are most at risk. (This 2004 EPA report to the Congress gives a great overview of CSO health impacts.)

Grossed out yet? Let’s delve deeper.

Read more

Making Asphalt a Little Less Sickening

parking lot_jgrimm_FlickrThere are a couple of ways to tackle the problem of polluted runoff: keep the water from getting fouled in the first place, or clean it up once it’s contaminated. It doesn’t take a hydrology expert to figure out that in many cases, it’s cheaper and easier to deal with a pollutant at its source before it’s dissolved in water and spread far and wide.

So goes the logic behind HB 1721, a bill proposed in Olympia that would ban the sale and application of coal-tar pavement sealants beginning next year. The sealants are applied to parking lots and driveways to make the asphalt longer lasting and give it a rich, black appearance. Trouble is, it doesn’t stay put. Like the paint on the side of your house, over time the sealant crumbles and peels off. When the rain hits the driveway or parking lot, it sponges up the bits of sealant and carries it away with the stormwater, depositing it into streams, rivers, lakes, and bays.

As you might expect from something called coal-tar pavement sealant, the product contains some nasty stuff. It has super high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, several of which are considered likely to cause cancer in people and can cause mutations or even kill tadpoles, herring, and other wildlife.

A study by the US Geologic Survey released in December found that in numerous lakes across the nation, the majority of PAHs polluting the waterbodies came from coal-tar sealants. Mud taken from Lake Ballinger in Mountlake Terrace, Wash., measured PAHs at 16.61 parts per million, with 11.83 ppm coming from the sealant. (The USGS reports harmful effects on wildlife and plants at 22.8 ppm.)

And the good news? There’s a lower-PAH alternative already in wide use.

Read more

×
Privacy Overview
Sightline Institute

More information about our privacy notice

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Additional Cookies

This website uses social media to collect anonymous information such as which platform are our users coming from.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us better reach our audiences.