fbpx
Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » Five Keystone XLs: The Carbon in Northwest Fossil Fuel Export Plans

Five Keystone XLs: The Carbon in Northwest Fossil Fuel Export Plans

Original Sightline Institute graphic by Don Baker Design, available under our free use policy.

SwatchJunkies

Welcome to Sightline Institute’s redesigned website!

You’ll find our same top-notch solutions research, just with a fresh new look. Learn more here about new features, or simply browse as usual. 

Sightline is releasing a new report, Northwest Fossil Fuel Exports, showing that the region is poised to become a carbon export hub of global consequence. A tally of the new coal, oil, and gas shipment schemes being planned in the Northwest finds that they would carry five times as much carbon as the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline.

Taken together, these plans would be capable of delivering enough fuel to release 822 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year. In the report, Sightline examines each project individually and does the carbon math to find that:

  • Coal terminals. Seven new or expanded coal export terminals would together move 132 million metric tons of coal annually above current levels, enough to emit 264 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.
  • Oil pipelines. Two new oil pipelines would be capable of carrying more than 1.1 million barrels per day, enough to emit 199 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually.
  • Oil-by-rail facilities. Eleven oil-by-rail facilities at refineries or port terminals could move 858,900 barrels per day, enough to emit 132 million metric tons of carbon dioxide each year.
  • Natural gas pipelines. At least six new natural gas pipelines capable of carrying 11.7 billion cubic feet per day would be enough to emit 227 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually.

The Pacific Northwest has long been known for environmental leadership and clean energy, but it is on the cusp of transforming into a major center for fossil fuel exports. Because the region stands squarely between Asian energy markets and large fossil fuel deposits in the interior of North America, the permitting decisions that Northwest officials make in the coming years will impact the global climate for years to come.

Read the full report.

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, forests, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

You can power us forward on sustainable solutions.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.