fbpx
Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » The Last and Largest Northwest Coal Export Schemes Would Bury Portland

The Last and Largest Northwest Coal Export Schemes Would Bury Portland

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.

SwatchJunkies

Welcome to Sightline Institute’s redesigned website!

You’ll find our same top-notch solutions research, just with a fresh new look. Learn more here about new features, or simply browse as usual. 

In 2016, the Northwest public will have a chance to voice its views on the two remaining coal export terminals proposed for Washington state. These projects would be the first and second largest coal terminals in North America, weighing in at 48 million tons per year (in Whatcom County) and 44 million tons annually (in Longview).

That sounds like a lot of coal… because it is.

All of that coal would be delivered by trains traveling through the scenic Columbia River Gorge and near Portland, Oregon, on their way to the planned terminals. So for comparison purposes, here’s how one year’s worth of coal would dwarf the biggest buildings in Portland:

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.

 

Even considering just the smaller of the two projects alone, the sheer quantity of coal is staggering:

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.

 

Here’s how that coal would look stack up in the Columbia River Gorge:

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.

 

And here’s how just one of the two projects would look:

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy.

In the last several years, the Northwest’s “Thin Green Line” of resistance successfully halted four of the six coal export projects originally proposed for the region. As the public evaluates these final—and by far largest—two coal schemes, it’s useful to remember just how big the coal industry’s ambitions are.

 

Sightline thanks Devin Porter at Goodmeasures.biz for designing these graphics.

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, forests, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

You can power us forward on sustainable solutions.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.