Alberta’s controversial and environmentally destructive tar sands industry suffered a major setback a few weeks ago when a Canadian court overturned permits for a proposed expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline. That project, designed to triple oil shipments from Edmonton, Alberta, to the Pacific coast, now faces new costs and delays, dashing the dreams of tar sands producers who are already struggling with transportation bottlenecks that have eaten away the industry’s profits.

Trans Mountain isn’t the only pipeline project that tar sands companies are pining for. Canadian pipeline giant Enbridge, Inc. is also planning to double the capacity of its “Line 3” pipeline, which connects northern Alberta to oil markets in the US Midwest and eastern Canada.

  • Our work is made possible by the generosity of people like you!

    Thanks to Rachael Hogan for supporting a sustainable Cascadia.

  • But while Alberta’s oil industry is certainly hoping that Enbridge expands Line 3, it isn’t their money that’s on the line. Instead, Sightline’s new analysis of Enbridge’s financial data shows the company will lean heavily on lending and financial services provided by global investment banks to fund the Line 3 expansion. Investment banks have extended billions of dollars in credit that Enbridge uses both for short-term spending and to meet Canada’s financial standards for oil spill liability. At the same time, the company relies on investment banks to facilitate asset sales, stock sales, and new debt that will fuel its ongoing $22 billion capital spending program.

    For all the gory details of how big banks fuel Enbridge’s tar sands pipeline, download Sightline’s latest energy market update.


    Download (PDF, 740KB)