Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » Fossil Fuel Transition » What Would Repealing an Accidental Tax Break Cost Oil Refineries?

What Would Repealing an Accidental Tax Break Cost Oil Refineries?

SwatchJunkies

February 4, 2014

Editor’s note: Earlier posts in this series used the figures $63 and $41 million in referring to the size of the loophole. The $59 million figure used below draws on newly available calculations from the WA OFM.

Facing a Supreme Court order to fund public education, Governor Inslee and others have combed through the state tax code in search of outdated and perverse tax loopholes. Perhaps none of them is more bizarre than the “extracted fuel use tax exemption”—a purely accidental giveaway to oil refineries that costs the state $59 million each budget cycle.

Oil companies are stalling to prevent paying the same taxes everyone else does, even though the cost of closing the loophole would represent only a tiny fraction—less than 1 percent—of their overall costs.

oil_tax_loophole--bar--013114--150ppi

Closing the loophole makes sense, as a means to both fund public education and inject a modicum of fairness into the state tax code. What’s more, the tax benefit, which dates to 1949, was never intended for oil companies in the first place. In fact, the law was written for sawmills at a time when there were no oil refineries in the state.

It was only later that refiners moved into Washington and exploited the tax code’s loose language so thoroughly that they now claim 98 percent of the benefit.

oil_tax_loophole--pie--013114--150ppi

Fortunately, there’s a bill in the legislature that would close the loophole and redirect the money to classrooms. I’ll be testifying on it before the House Finance committee on February 6 at 8 am.

You can find more information about the tax loophole in this blog series, and also here:

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades. A leading expert on coal, oil, and gas export plans in the Pacific Northwest, he is an authority on a range of issues connected to fossil fuel transport, including carbon emissions, local pollution, transportation system impacts, rail policy, and economics.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

3 thoughts on “What Would Repealing an Accidental Tax Break Cost Oil Refineries?”

  1. this is totally wrong to give any business tax breaks that cost us the citizens (people) of this country and State extra money. It is not a balance that they create. They come with promises and leave us with the mess to clean up, pay for and we loose all the way around. While they walk off with all the money, profit’s that cost us. This needs to end, Close all the loopholes and stop the lobbying payoffs also. If it is a good business it should be able to stand on its own credits and good will and honest work. leaving a clean environment and be safe for all living here.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.

Thanks to Ellen Blackstone for supporting a sustainable Cascadia.

Our work is made possible by the generosity of people like you.

×