Donate Newsletters
Home » Messaging + Strategy » My Messaging Pet Peeves

My Messaging Pet Peeves

Easy fixes for common messaging missteps.

Two dogs on leashes.
Tanakawho, Flickr.com

Anna Fahey

July 19, 2012

Even seasoned communicators slip into a bad habit or two. And from time to time, we all make messaging missteps that we could easily avoid.

So, in this month’s Flashcard I tackle three of my top (small-scale) messaging pet peeves: Using too many acronyms—even familiar ones, overusing the passive voice, and forgetting to swap lackluster articles for powerful pronouns. (I call these “pets” because they’re some of my own worst habits—and they’re easy to fix!)

I’m not claiming that words are magic. Even when we use all the right ones we can’t solve all the world’s problems—obviously. But words do matter; and even the littlest ones can help your message hit home.

Quick Fixes for Messaging Pet Peeves

Acronyms. Stop using them. Even the most familiar ones—like the EPA—risk alienating. Polls show that the full name—Environmental Protection Agency—yields a bump in support.

Weed out the passive. You wield the power to name (and blame) bad guys or give heroes due credit—but only if you use active sentence construction. Think: Who did what to whom? (The climate is warming vs. We are warming our climate.)

Get possessive with pronouns. Instead of “the government” or “the climate,” try “our government” and “our climate.” Switch to pronouns like our, we, us, you, and your to make concepts less abstract and paint people into the picture.

If you’d like to go a bit deeper on these tips, here’s further reading:

What are your messaging pet peeves? Send them my way.

Talk to the Author

Anna Fahey

Anna Fahey, Principal Director of Strategy, leads Sightline Institute's framing and messaging strategies and coordinates the organization’s cross-cutting legislative campaigns. She serves on Sightline’s executive team.

Talk to the Author

Anna Fahey

Anna Fahey, Principal Director of Strategy, leads Sightline Institute's framing and messaging strategies and coordinates the organization’s cross-cutting legislative campaigns. She serves on Sightline’s executive team.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

6 thoughts on “My Messaging Pet Peeves”

  1. Underuse of exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!
    You can never to many, IMHO!!! (Ooops, sorry for the acronym!!!) Especially if you’re trying to communicate impending doom!!!!!!!

  2. I don’t appreciate someone outside my control managing my conversations on Facebook. I Google myself and find my Facebook information. I prefer corresponding with people on personal email
    and not interracting with hundreds of friends of friends of friends that I have never seen or probably never will see in person.

    We have so many ways to communicate and rarely pay attention to them all.

  3. Our climate? Our government? We do not own these things. These things are not our possessions. Don’t get it twisted. Calling everything “ours” is anthropocentric, self-centered and just plain wrong.

  4. Good observation on acronyms, it’s something I often try to talk clients away from. Re: possessive pronouns, I don’t think it’s about ownership, so much as stewardship and encouraging people to feel empowered to make changes. Is that anthropocentric? Maybe, but if it get’s people more involved I’m ok with it.

  5. –Incorrect use of its and it’s
    –Referring to bulk nouns with the modifier less. One has less flour, sugar, pollution or influence, but there are fewer people, bills, accidents and elections.
    –There is now one space between sentences–not two.
    –Blocks of text that the writer doesn’t break up with some white space (Skimming is epidemic and solid, long blocks of text make it much less likely that your reader will get to your message.)
    –incorrect homonyms: two for to for too, your for you’re, aid and aide, I’ll and aisle and isle

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.

Thanks to Valerie Kinast for supporting a sustainable Cascadia.

Our work is made possible by the generosity of people like you.

×
Privacy Overview
Sightline Institute

More information about our privacy notice

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Additional Cookies

This website uses social media to collect anonymous information such as which platform are our users coming from.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us better reach our audiences.