Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » Fossil Fuel Transition » Mapping the Thin Green Line

Mapping the Thin Green Line

Eric de Place

Sightline has tracked Northwest fossil fuel transport developments since 2010 when the region saw its first proposal for large-scale coal exports. Since that time, communities from Coos Bay, Oregon, to Prince Rupert, British Columbia, have weathered wave after wave of schemes from the coal, oil, and gas industries. Yet, much to the surprise of most observers, Cascadia has proven enormously resilient: tribes and First Nations, environmental advocates, and scores of others have defeated nearly ever project they’ve opposed.

Today, Sightline is publishing a new interactive map of the Northwest’s fight against dirty energy shipment schemes—the movement that Sightline calls the Thin Green Line. The map is designed to write the history of these controversies even as it tracks new and emerging threats to the region.

Our research team will update and elaborate the map as things change. We hope you’ll take a close look and let us know what you think.

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades. A leading expert on coal, oil, and gas export plans in the Pacific Northwest, he is an authority on a range of issues connected to fossil fuel transport, including carbon emissions, local pollution, transportation system impacts, rail policy, and economics.

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades. A leading expert on coal, oil, and gas export plans in the Pacific Northwest, he is an authority on a range of issues connected to fossil fuel transport, including carbon emissions, local pollution, transportation system impacts, rail policy, and economics.

Talk to the Author

Keiko Budech

Keiko Budech was a senior communications associate for Sightline Institute.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

32 thoughts on “Mapping the Thin Green Line”

  1. Hello. Thank you for creating this. I am a citizen of Douglas County, Oregon and would like to suggest an edit to the map. The Jordan Cove and Pacific Connector projects are back on the table. The “dead” and “maybe dead” dots are accurate, as the project was defeated once before. However, one of the previous companies involved (Veresen) has reactivated the project (Williams is no longer involved in this new one).

    The new application for the almost identical project is being considered by FERC (docket number PF17-4-000) and scoping meetings will begin in a week, 6/27 in Coos Bay (unless the thin green line can push them back to the required 90-120 days from notice time-frame, instead of the two weeks they gave).

    Thank you for your time

    • Rindy, thanks for sending this. I’ll look into it and figure out whether to update those items. Please do send along information that’s germane.

      • Based on the company’s notice of intent to prepare an EIS I updated both projects to reflect “active proposal” status.

  2. Hi Eric!
    Great resource!!! Thank you.

    I was familiarizing myself with the tool, and noticed a correction is in order. PGE has an active proposal to sell the Port Westward tank farm to CPBR as an oil terminal. I sent letters to Governor Brown and a VP at PGE, encouraging them that there is more value to scrapping that tank farm than selling it, based on the current political climate.

    Is there a mechanism where your “fan club” can send you updates so you can keep the tool current. Thanks again for the great work.

  3. This is a terrible map! I’d would have liked to see a much more detailed area around Tacoma. As a former map maker, I think people deserve to have a more accurate map to really see what is really happening and how it will affect them.

    Fred Veler
    Tacoma

    • Fred, it’s a Google map, so it’s quite accurate even at a very small scale. You can zoom into any local area and find the precise location of fossil fuel projects relative to the surrounding communities.

  4. Is the focus of this map transportation-related projects (i.e., the movement of fossil fuels?) If so, you should clarify this in your introductory language.

    The map appears to omit proposed new natural gas power plants. Friends of the Columbia Gorge and our allies have had some great success against new natural gas power plants in Oregon. We stopped the Troutdale Energy Center in Troutdale, Oregon in early 2016, and in 2017 we got the Carty Generating Station (Units 2 and 3) in Boardman, Oregon put on indefinite hold.

    Information about all proposed natural gas power plants in the region can be found at the websites of the Washington EFSEC and the Oregon EFSC.

    Nathan Baker, Senior Staff Attorney
    Friends of the Columbia Gorge

    • Fair point, Nathan. In this map we’re tracking proposals to move fossil fuels. I’ve amended the language accordingly.

  5. Went to an educational talk given by Tarika Mallory in Everett WA last month and learned so much about LNG. I see on Snohomish County Website a company by the name of Northwest Pipeline LLC has applied for a public access permit for using county and state roads into unincorporated parts of Snohomish County for construction of a natural gas system through our county. The County Engineer is recommending adoption of this request and signed off on December 17, 2017. What does this group know about that company, its request for access. According to the application this company is from Delaware but I am suspicious of it being a shell for PSE and its development of more and more LNG.

  6. Thanks for this highly educational map. We would love to see you add the sites of struggles in California where we like to think of ourselves as part of the Thin Green Line. For over three years, Oakland has been fighting construction of a coal terminal with capacity of 10 million MT per year. Richmond, site of an immense Chevron refinery, is beginning to fight an existing coal export facility that has been polluting vulnerable neighborhoods for over 50 years. And Vallejo is in the midst of a pitch battle over a proposed marine terminal that would bring a cement factory and potential coal shipments to its port. We take inspiration from the struggles to our north as we try to hold the line here.

    Ted Franklin
    Co-coordinator
    “nocoalinoakland.org”>No Coal in Oakland

    System Change Not Climate Change!

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.

Thanks to Allen & Laura Puckett for supporting a sustainable Cascadia.

Our work is made possible by the generosity of people like you.

×
Privacy Overview
Sightline Institute

More information about our privacy notice

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Additional Cookies

This website uses social media to collect anonymous information such as which platform are our users coming from.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us better reach our audiences.