Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » Fossil Fuel Transition » Northwest Targets: Communities Threatened by Fossil Fuels

Northwest Targets: Communities Threatened by Fossil Fuels

Tacoma City Council will vote on an amended ordinance to expand a moratorium on developing on the Tacoma tideflats.

SwatchJunkies

June 20, 2017

Sightline is publishing a new report, “Northwest Targets,” that provides a risk assessment for the region. The report analyzes every community in Oregon and Washington targeted by large-scale fossil fuel proposals since 2010. It reviews the history of local struggles with fossil fuel development proposals and gauges the risks of future proposals.

“Northwest Targets” identifies three places that are prime targets for future dirty energy expansion:

  1. Lower Columbia River: A cluster of ports on the Columbia—Longview and Kalama in Washington and Port Westward in Oregon—have faced nearly a dozen fossil fuel proposals.
  2. Tacoma, Washington: The heavily industrialized Puget Sound city is wrestling with several active fossil fuel proposals and is almost certain to be the site of future plans.
  3. Cherry Point, Washington: Of great cultural importance to the Lummi Nation, this area is already a major center of fossil fuel activity and is at substantial risk of further development.

Northwest communities are not powerless, however. Each has at its disposal a secret weapon: fortifying local land use laws to protect themselves from coal, oil, and gas projects. By limiting the ability of dirty energy companies to build new projects, these places are protecting their residents and their local economies, even as they chart a course for other communities that face similar risks.

The risk of new fossil fuel developments in Northwest communities is hard to predict. Yet it is possible to provide a rough rank-ordering of the most threatened places based on the quantity, scale, and track record of dirty energy proposals; the existence of connected fossil fuel infrastructure; and the presence of protective land use laws.

In “Northwest Targets,” Sightline assesses the current threat to each community in Oregon and Washington that has been targeted by at least one large-scale fossil fuel proposal since 2010. Ranked from least to most threatened, these communities are the Northwest’s target communities.

Find the full report for download here.

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades. A leading expert on coal, oil, and gas export plans in the Pacific Northwest, he is an authority on a range of issues connected to fossil fuel transport, including carbon emissions, local pollution, transportation system impacts, rail policy, and economics.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

9 thoughts on “Northwest Targets: Communities Threatened by Fossil Fuels”

  1. Also include 2 proposals in Vancouver as part of the Lower Columbia River and a propane terminal immediately across the Columbia from Vancouver.

    • Don, I think we captured each of those projects in the full report. Take a look and let us know if you spot something missing!

  2. If someone wants to help, is there such a thing as a comprehensive list of all of the involved organizations, and contact numbers, websites, etc..?

    • That’s a good idea David.

      I run NoMethanol360.com to support local citizens fighting the largest methanol refinery in the world from coming to the small town of Kalama WA on the shores of the lower Columbia.

      I also run GreenPartySWWA.org where I have a “resources” page of many of the organizations fighting these battles, e.g. PowerPastCoal. Those could serve as a jumping off point for putting together a comprehensive list tied to each specific project.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.

Thanks to Jeanie Garrity for supporting a sustainable Cascadia.

Our work is made possible by the generosity of people like you.

×
Privacy Overview
Sightline Institute

More information about our privacy notice

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Additional Cookies

This website uses social media to collect anonymous information such as which platform are our users coming from.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us better reach our audiences.